The trial is over, the jury has gone home, the cameras are in search for their next made for TV docudrama or Courtroom TV case and the lawyers have either bit the dust or are preparing to be elevated among the best attorney’s on the planet.
Casey Anthony is acquitted and is about to become rich, her family is going to cash in on their role in the process, some publishing house is about to write a number one best seller, some movie studio is about to produce a box office hit and some TV anchor, or TV personality is about to increase their stock by receiving the first official interview of prime suspects, witnesses and jurors.
Pundits are analyzing the case after the fact as their ratings continue to skyrocket while millions of viewers are glued to their favorite TV station in hopes of hearing new information about a trial that is history and will make history. Law schools all across the country are preparing to use this case in comparison to the O.J. Simpson case as mandatory study material in consideration of receiving an earned Jurist Doctorate degree.
Analyst and commentators are committing the “paralysis of analysis” as they intrigue their viewers with thoughts like “being found not guilty is not the same as being innocent,” “the justice systems continues to work,” “A good defense or a bad prosecution” and “I wonder who is the father of Caylee.”
Stop the madness. A child is dead; justice for Caylee has not been served and it seems that nobody really cares. I wonder if there is no interest in the death of Caylee because there are no financial opportunities attached to it. Nonetheless, Casey is going to be free, and as she is set free, I can only think of the phrase “liar, liar, pants on fire.” And in the words of Dr. Drew, “If she’s (Casey’s) the monster people think she is, she will have her day.”
If you wish to comment, please do so at the end of this blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment